REVISITING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING (TBLT) IN INDONESIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL: CURRENT ISSUES AND POSSIBILITIES

Authors

  • Mohamad Arif Ismail School of Arts, University of Leicester, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.601612

Keywords:

TBLT, Indonesian Secondary School, Comparison, Alternatives, Possibilities

Abstract

Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) has been widely administered in Asian countries including Indonesia. This paper aims to investigate its implementation in Indonesian secondary school context using the previous research to present comparison. As identified, either target language issue and national examination as it is applied in the curriculum remain in the same situation. Another finding has indicated that the notion of TBLT contradicts to the cultural value of Indonesian students. Having reviewed the relevant studies, this article suggests some potential alternatives in order to move forward: 1) utilizing the teaching procedure called ‘Engage, Study, Activate’ (ESA), 2) employing ‘mediated learning’ and 3) embedding local culture in the teaching materials. Finally, this study addresses the possibility of TBLT in the future particularly in Indonesian context.

References

Al Farabi, R. (2015). Cultural Barriers in English Language Learning: A Socio- Linguistic Perspective. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1(5), 71-76.

Akasha, O. (2013). Exploring the Challenges Facing Arabic-Speaking ESL Students & Teachers in Middle School. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 1(1), 12-31.

Burrows, C. (2008). An Evaluation of Task-Based Learning (TBL) in the Japanese Classroom. English Today, 24(4), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078408000345

Butler, Y.G. (2011). The Implementation of Communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asia-Pacific Region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000122

Carless, D. (2008). Student Use of the Mother Tongue in the Task-based Classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm090

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fachrurrazy. (2000). Task-Based Activities in TEFL. TEFLIN Journal, 11(1), 66-77.

Furaidah, F., A. Saukah, and U. Widiati. (2015). Washback of English National Examination in the Indonesian Context. TEFLIN Journal, 26(1), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i1/36-58

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn029

Hismanoglu, M., and S. Hismanoglu. (2011). Task-Based Language Teaching: What Every EFL Teacher Should Do. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.049

Hu, G.W. (2005). English Language Education in China: Policies, Progress, and Problems. Language Policy, 4, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-6561-7

Lai, C. (2015). Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asian Context: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? In Thomas & Reinders (Eds.), Contemporary Task-Based Language Teaching in Asia, (pp. 12-29). London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Lantolf. J.P. (2000). Second Language Learning as a Mediated Process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015329

Lee, S.M. (2005). The Pros and Cons of task-based instruction in elementary English classes. English Teaching, 60(2), 185-205.

Lie, A. (2007). Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: Between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for Higher Test Scores. TEFLIN Journal, 18(1), 1-15.

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching in East Asian Classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363

Madya, S. (2007). Curriculum Innovation in Indonesia and the Strategies to Implement Them, in Choi and Spolsky, ELT Curriculum Innovation and Implementation in Asia (pp. 1-38). Seoul: Asia TEFL.

Marcelino, M. (2008). English Language Teaching in Indonesia: A Continuous Challenge in Education and Cultural Diversity. TEFLIN Journal, 19(1), 57-69.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching: A Comprehensively Revised Edition of Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336

Nunan, D. (2006). Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asia Context: Defining ‘Task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. and T.S. Rodgers (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

Royani, M. (2013). The Use of Local Culture Texts for Enthusiastic English Reading Teaching. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 130-135.

Sulistyo, G. H. (2009). English as a Measurement Standard in The National Examination: Some Grassroots’ Voice. TEFLIN Journal, 20(1), 1-24.

Suryanto. (2014). Issues in Teaching English in a Cultural Context: A Case of Indonesia. Journal of English Literacy Education, 1(2), 75-83.

Tuyet, T.T. (2013). The Causes of Passiveness in Learning of Vietnamese Students. VNU Journal of Education Research, 29(2), 72-84.

Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based Language Teaching in a Nutshell, in Van den Branden, Task-Based Language Education: From Theory to Practice (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282

Xu, Q. (2008). Coping with Cultural to Speaking English in the Chinese Context. Asian Social Sciences, 4(12), 83-85.

Yulia, Y. (2013). Teaching Challenges in Indonesia: Motivating Students and Teachers’ Classroom Language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1:16.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-16

How to Cite

Ismail, M. A. (2017). REVISITING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING (TBLT) IN INDONESIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL: CURRENT ISSUES AND POSSIBILITIES. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.601612