LINKAGE AND INTEGRATION WORK OF COMMUNITY WELFARE NETWORK WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN UTTARADIT PROVINCE, THAILAND

Authors

  • Chontida Utessanan PhD Student Social Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
  • Montri Kunphoommarl Prof., Dr., Faculty of Social Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.15241539

Keywords:

Linkage and Integration with Associate Community Welfare Fund Network in Uttaradit Province Thailand Community Welfare Fund Network with Mix Welfare

Abstract

Community welfare is driven by outside motivation, which results in adaptation of the community to the care of one another in the form of welfare. From this factor, Uttaradit province is awake and developing the model of community welfare. So it brings to overview the work of Uttaradit Community Welfare Fund Network in Thailand (Ut-CWFN).  The study was qualitative research. The instrument used in this study was in-depth interview.  The  objectives   of  the  study  were 1)  to the process of  implementation  of  (Ut-CWFN) and 2)  to pattern of linkage  and  integration  of   (Ut-CWFN) by in – depth  interviews  and  participant with 10 keys leader in (Ut-CWFN). Inclusion criteria from the volunteer sacrifice of the previous welfare fund work. And people in the community trust to represent the network. Data analysis by content analysis. The results of the study were as follows: 1) Process driven network of (Ut-CWFN) caused by participation of member, community, private and government. 2) Pattern of linkage and integration of   (Ut-CWFN) with associate. The factors listed above to represent the region in driving Community Welfare Fund national policy in Thailand.This study show that mix welfare, integrate, associate and network support to the fund is strong equality and sustainable fund. 

References

Carrillo, Beatriz and Ducket Jane t. 2011. China’s Changing Welfare Mix Local perspectives. New York : Routledge.

Fitzpatrick Tony. (2011). Welfare Theory. New york : Palgrave Macmillan.

Giddens, Antony. (2000). The third way The Renewal of Social Democracy. Usa : Blackwell.

Heywood, Phil. (2011). Community Planning Integratting social and physical enviroments. Australia : Queensland University of Technology.

Kitipat Nontatamdan (2006) Critical Theory in Social Policy and Planning. Bangkok: Thammasat University

Kutsar, Dagmar and Kuronen, Marjo. (2015). Local Welfare Policy Making in European Cities. London : New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16163-1

Midgley, James and Hosaka Mitsuhiko. 2011. Grassroots Social Security in Asia Mutual Aid, Microinsurance and Social Welfare. New York: Routledge

Narong Petprasert (2001). The Community Welfare. Bankok : Political Economy, Vol 17 Chulalongkorn University.

Narong Petprasert. (2006). Social Welfare the Dimensions of Well-Being Is Entitled. Bangkok : Edison Prestige Products.

Sjoberg Stefan and Rambaree Komalsingh. (2014) Collective empowerment: A comparative study of community work in Mumbai and Stockholm. Journal of Social Welfare. 24(4), 364–375. 24

Ugo, Ascoli and Costanzo Ranci, 2002. Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix The New Structure of Welfare in an Era of Privatization. New York : Routledge. in – depth interviews with 10 keys leader (2016)

Downloads

Published

2017-10-16

How to Cite

Utessanan, C., & Kunphoommarl, M. (2017). LINKAGE AND INTEGRATION WORK OF COMMUNITY WELFARE NETWORK WITH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN UTTARADIT PROVINCE, THAILAND. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1524–1539. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.15241539