USE OF GRAPHIC NARRATIVES WITH PRESERVICE TEACHERS AS A MEDIATED LEARNING TOOL

Authors

  • Guillermina Gavaldon-Hernandez Lecturer at University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
  • Ana Gerboles-Sanchez Lecturer at University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain
  • Francisco Saez de Adana Lecturer at University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.13231336

Keywords:

Creativity, Critical Thinking, Comics, Higher Education, Preservice Teachers

Abstract

Despite the use of comics in education as a tool for reading or language learning, little is known about its potential as a mediated learning tool in Higher Education settings. This paper presents a preliminary study, part of a bigger project conducted as an action-research approach which aims to gain knowledge on the use of comics in higher education as a tool to develop comprehension and thinking skills. The study was carried out at one of the Spanish universities located in the Madrid region. The study involved 71 student teachers of an undergraduate course who were trained on how to read and create comics: use of diverse types of software, composition basis, communication elements and conventions of comics’ design. Students had the freedom to create their comics choosing the software they felt most comfortable with since the purpose of the study was to analyse the composition of their stories and the way they gave meaning to learning through them. Comics were analysed and categorised according to the story they told, feelings and emotions they showed, complexity and originality. Even the comics' design was well achieved, students were focused on their graphic composition rather than on the educational problems the comics should have conveyed. Findings suggest that even though comic’s creation encouraged students’ creativity and critical reflection, developing visual thinking skills takes time and needs to be practised as it is a scaffolding process. Future studies will be focused on developing preliminary visual thinking skills before asking students to express their subject knowledge creating their graphic narratives.

References

Ball, D. M., & Kuhlman, M. B. (2010). The Comics of Chris Ware : Drawing Is a Way of Thinking. University Press of Mississippi.

Berger, A. (1971). Comics and Culture. Journal Of Popular Culture, V(1), 164–178 ST–Comics and Culture. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1971.0501_164.x

Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (2006). Affective and Motivational Outcomes of Working in Collaborative Groups. Educational Psychology, 26(2), 187–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344217

Botzakis, S. (2013). Why I Teach Comics in Higher Education. Knowledge Quest, 41(3), 68–70.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Cook, M. P. (2017). Now I ‘See’: The Impact of Graphic Novels on Reading Comprehension in High School English Classrooms. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(1), 21–53. http://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1244869

Demirdag, S. (2014). Student Engagement and Writing Tasks in Science Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(1), 38–44.

Dickinson, H., & Werner, M. (2015). Beyond Talking Heads: Sourced Comics and the Affordances of Multimodality. Composition Studies, 51–74.

Doolittle, P. E., Hicks, D., Triplett, C. F., Nichols, W. D., & Young, C. A. (2006). Reciprocal Teaching for Reading Comprehension in Higher Education: A Strategy for Fostering the Deeper Understanding of Texts. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 106–118.

Eisner, W. (2008). Comics and sequential art : principles and practices from the legendary cartoonist. W.W. Norton.

Emmel, N. (University of L., & Clark, A. (2011). Learning to Use Visual Methodologies in Our Research: A Dialogue Between Two Researchers. FORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG, 12(1), Art. 36.

Fitri, S. (2017). Interactions Of Student And Supervisor In Skripsi Research: Understanding Differences In Perspectives And Expectation. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2).

Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2008). Teaching visual literacy : using comic books, graphic novels, anime, cartoons, and more to develop comprehension and thinking skills. California: Corwin Press.

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. a. (2000). Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2714

Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

Liebenberg, L. (2009). The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 441–467. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337877

McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research : international contexts and consequences. State University of New York Press.

Meskin, A. (2009). Comics as literature? British Journal of Aesthetics. http://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp025

Palincsar, A. S. (1998). SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHING AND LEARNING. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345–375. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345

Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839–858. http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X

Riessman, C. K. (2002). Narrative Analysis. In Handbook of Interview Research (pp. 695–710). http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, 2nd edition by David Silverman. Sage, London, 2001, 325 pages, f17.99, ISBN 0 761 96865 2. SAGE Publications. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.2167b.x

Tonucci, F. (2007). Frato, 40 años con ojos de niño. Barcelona: Graó.

Vygotsky, L. S. (Lev S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, M. (2017). Multiliteracies, Multimodality, New Literacies and …. What Do These Mean for Literacy Education? (pp. 19–33). http://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000011002

Whiley, D., Witt, B., Colvin, R. M., Sapiains Arrue, R., & Kotir, J. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking skills in first year environmental management students: a tale of curriculum design, application and reflection. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(2), 166–181. http://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2017.1290590

Downloads

Published

2017-10-13

How to Cite

Gavaldon-Hernandez, G., Gerboles-Sanchez, A., & Adana, F. (2017). USE OF GRAPHIC NARRATIVES WITH PRESERVICE TEACHERS AS A MEDIATED LEARNING TOOL. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1323–1336. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.13231336