TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE ON THE MACAO EDUCATION REFORM POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.13091322Keywords:
Teacher’s Perspectives, Education Reform, Policy, Macao EducationAbstract
The paper presents an overview to understand the perceptions, reflections, opinions and perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers in Macao local schools in respect to policies and plans introduced by the Macao government department, the Education and Youth Affairs Bureau (DSEJ). The DSEJ had been working on the Macao Education Reform since 2011, and the Ten Year Plan for the Development of Non-Tertiary Education was in progress accordingly. Various policies and actions continued to proceed in accordance with the Macao Education Reform. The paper examines the situation through the lenses of teachers’ perceptions regarding the success and effectiveness of these policies introduced by the government department in MacaoThe study followed a mixed methods approach, utiliing detailed information from interviews with pre-service and in-service teachers followed by a survey. The initial phase of the study aimed to identify the range of different beliefs and attitudes towards the plans and policies introduced by the government department in Macao. The results from this initial phase were then used to develop a survey which was administered to a larger sample of pre-service and in-service school teachers from various types of school. The data were used to quantify the extent to which different beliefs and attitudes towards the various plans and policies introduced by DSEJ were endorsed by teachers in Macao. The results of the study provide valuable information on the extent to which Macao teachers agree on the new policies introduced by DSEJ; whether there is any difference in respect of pre-service and in-service teachers; what teachers’ perceptions are of the positives and negatives of the policies; and how effective the policies introduced by the government department in Macao are.
References
Chan, J. K. S. (2012). Curriculum policy implementation: How schools respond to government’s ‘soft’ policy in the curriculum reform. Curriculum Journal, Sep 2012, 23(3), 371–386.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
DSEJ-Macao. (2017a). Ten year plan for the development of non-tertiary education (2011–2020). Retrieved from Macao Government, the Education and Youth Affairs Bureau website: http://202.175.82.54/dsej/magazine/dsej_book/2011/82e.pdf?timeis= Tue%20Jun%2006%2011:39:47%20GMT+08:00%202017&&
DSEJ-Macao. (2017b). The requirement of the basic academic attainments.
Retrieved from Macao Government, the Education and Youth Affairs Bureau website: website: http://www.dsej.gov.mo/crdc/edu/requirements-e.html?timeis=Tue%20Jun%2006% 2015:10:31%20GMT+08:00%202017&&&
Harris, A., Jones, M., Adams, D., Perera, C., & Sharma, S. (2014). High-performing education systems in Asia: Leadership art meets implementation science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Dec 2014, 23(4), 861–869.
Hoffman, P. (2016). Reimagining tenure reform from a teacher’s perspective. Phi Delta Kappan. March 2016, 97(6), 22–26.
Jensen, B. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Carlton: Grattan Report.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1, 7–24.
OECD. (2104). PISA 2012 results. Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real life problems (Volume V). OECD Publishing.
Riley, K., & Solic, K. (2017). ‘Change happens beyond the comfort zone’: Bringing undergraduate teacher-candidates into activist teacher communities. Journal of Teacher Education. March–April, 2017, 68(2), 179–192.
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Torenvlied, R., & Akkerman, A. (2004). Theory of ‘soft’ policy implementation in multi-level systems with an application to social partnership in the Netherlands. Acta and Politica 39(1), 31–58.
Woodrow, K., & Caruana, V. (2017). Preservice teachers’ perspective: Transformations as social change agents. Journal of Transformative Education, Jan 2017, 15(1), 37–58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.