TRANSFER OF HETEROGENEOUS KNOWLEDGE ALONG THE DUAL-NETWORK OF MNCS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.965981Keywords:
Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary, Network Analysis, Multinational CompanyAbstract
The literature on knowledge transfer in multinational companies (MNCs) reveals little of to what extent different types of knowledge are exchanged by the subsidiaries in the dual-network of the MNC. The objective of this paper is to fill this gap and to present the kinds of knowledge network of the MNC. This research is based on case study. An MNC is selected which of headquarter is located in Turkey and subsidiaries in 15 different countries including England, China, S. Africa. A wide variety of knowledge can be transferred from subsidiaries to the MNC. The study deals with the knowledge transfer having a potential of usage in product innovation. Using network analysis, the paper reveals that what types of knowledge subsidiaries are willing to search for and transfer through their network ties. The three types of knowledge are distributed and exchanged by subsidiaries along with the dual-network of MNC. Intensity and pervasiveness of knowledge flows display any differences between three types of knowledge. Additionally, knowledge flows' route could be defined. Thus, where knowledge was travelling in an environment could be revealed. This finding is especially important for managers to establish the new knowledge routes.
References
Achcaoucaou, F., Miravitlles, P., & Leon-Darder, F. (2014). Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness. International Business Review, 23 (1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.08.006
Almeida, P. & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (8-9), 847-864. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.388
Andersson, U., Bjorkman, I., & Forsgren, M. (2005). Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review, 14 (5), 521-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.001
Andersson, U., Forsgren, M. ve Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 979-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.267
Bartlett, C. A. & Beamish, P. W. (2011). Transnational management: Text, cases and readings in cross-border management. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: MA: Analytic Technologies.
Cavanagh, A. & Freeman, S. (2012). The development of subsidiary roles in the motor vehicle manufacturing industry. International Business Review, 21 (4), 602-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.07.005
Chen, T.-J., Chen H., &, Ku, Y.-H. (2012). Resource dependency and parent–subsidiary capability transfers. Journal of World Business. 47: 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2011.04.013
Damanpour, F. & Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8 (2), 423–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557 https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
Fossas-Olalla, M., Minguela-Rata, B., López-Sánchez, J., & Fernández-Menéndez, J. (2015). Product innovation: When should suppliers begin to collaborate?. Journal of Business Research, 68 (7), 1404-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.022
Gubbins, C. & Dooley, L. (2014). Exploring social network dynamics driving knowledge management for innovation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23 (2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492613499203
Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. CA: University of California.
Harryson, S. J., Dudkowski, R., & Stern, A. (2008). Transformation networks in innovation alliances – The development of Volvo C70. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (4), 745-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00768.x
Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18 (4), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
Lee, R. P., Chen, Q., Kim, D., & Johnson, J. L. (2008). Knowledge transfer between multinational corporations’ headquarters and their subsidiaries: Influences on and implications for new product outcomes. Journal of International Marketing, 16 (2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.16.2.1
Michailova, S. & Zhan, W. (2015). Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 50 (3), 576-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.001
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400093
Najafi-Tavani, Z., Giroud, A., & Andersson, U. (2014). The interplay of networking activities and internal knowledge actions for subsidiary influence within MNCs. Journal of World Business, 49, 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.02.004
OECD & EUROSTAT (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting. Paris: OECD Publications.
Phene, A. & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5), https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400383
Reilly, M. & Scott, P. S. (2014). Subsidiary driven innovation within shifting MNC structures: identifying new challenges and research directions. Technovation, 34 (3), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.004
Sammarra, A. & Biggiero, L. (2008). Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 800-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00770.x
Snijders, T. A. B. & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). Non-parametric standard errors and tests for network statistics. Connections, 22, 139–57.
Subramaniam, M. & Venkatraman, N. (2001). Determinants of transnational new product development capability: Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (4), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.163
Subramaniam, M., Rosenthal, S. R., & Hatten, K. J. (1998). Global new product development processes: Preliminary findings and research propositions. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (6), 773-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00119
Zhang, J., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Hoenig, S. (2009). Product development strategy, product innovation performance, and the mediating role of knowledge utilization: Evidence from subsidiaries in China. Journal of International Marketing, 17 (2), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.17.2.42
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
