POSTMODERN LIBERALISM AND SOLIDARITY: RICHARD RORTY

Authors

  • Ferdi Selim Research Assistant, Philosophy Department,Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.654671

Keywords:

Contingency, Liberal Ironist and Public Sphere, Solidarity, Multiculturalism, Others

Abstract

“Multiculturalism”, “living together” and “cohabitation” are of universal issues at the moment. As known for most of us, alienation and estrangement are widespread as well. Even the existence of “other” is not tolerated sometimes.  Initially, it must be stated that the scope of the problem is wider than it is presumed to be and cannot be solved through induction since the bigoted beliefs and the traditionalized habits are at the core. This common approach relies on having a sole list of truth lading, a sole definition of humanitarian status and a sole universal context of respective lives.   The given concept of belief must be replaced with “contingency”. The individual with the conscience of contingencies gets rid of metaphysical and theological truths and be set free.  The liberal societies of our century must produce much more people who are able to accept the contingency of vocabulary which is used to utter the utmost hopes – contingency of their conscience – and still remain loyal to commands of respective consciences.The present study aims at presenting a liberal, pluralist and contingent proposition for a solution in context with the given case. The proposition essentially based on the concepts which are spearheaded by Richard Rorty, a leading American intellectual, for postmodern liberal countries. Richard Rorty claims that the concept of “one of us” can be enlarged as such to include those who once were defined as “others”. In this respect, “us” is much more limited and local compared to human race. The sentiment of solidarity cannot be clarified enough through the approach of “just another human”. The mutual sharing and features of humans are effective in constituting the sentiment of solidarity as “one of us”. His given approach whose chief task is to encourage solidarity and being us is in an endeavor to forge a type of liberal ironist individual. The liberal ironist individuals who stand against suppression, be aware of contingency and be in a perpetual quest to realize them are the champions of solidarity and progress. Another significant task of this study is to investigate the probabilities of achieving Rorty’s given claims. 

References

Anlı, Ömer Faik (2015). “Ussallık, Dil, Anlam ve Bilgi İlişkisi Bağlamında ‘Temelsiz’ Söylemlerin Karşıt – Tezleri”, The Journal of Faculty of Languages History and Geography, Ankara: Ankara University, Vol 55(2).

Bacon, Michael (2010). Richard Rorty- Pragmatizm ve Politik Liberalizm, trans. Banu Özdemir, İstanbul: Sitare Publishing.

Bernstein, Richard J. (2003). “Rorty’s Inspirational Liberalism”, Richard Rorty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951.007

Danka, I. (2011). “A Case Study on the Limits of Ironic Redescription: Rorty on Wittgenstein”, The Roots of Rorty’s Philosophy, vol 2(1).

Er, Sadık Erol (2015). “Wittgenstein‟ı Rorty ve Irigaray ile Okumak”, Beytulhikme An International Jofurnal of Philosophy Vol 5(2).

Guignon, Charles & Hiley, David R. (2003). Richard Rorty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951

Gutmann, Amy (Ed.) (2014). Çokkültürcülük, Tanınma Politikası, trans. Özcan Kabakçıoğlu, Ankara: YKY.

Kaya, Funda Günsoy (2006). “Introduction”, Felsefe ve Doğanın Aynası, trans. Funda Günsoy Kaya, İstanbul: Paradigma Publishing.

Kearney, Richard & William, James (1996). “Narrative and Ethics”, Proceed-ings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol 70(1).

Kletzl, S. (2012). “About Pictures Which Held Us Captive: Richard Rorty Reads Wittgenstein”, 35th International Wittgenstein Symposium: Ethics, Society, Politics, Kirchberg am Wechsel: 5-11 August.

Kundakçı, Deniz (2012). “Rorty’nin Liberal Demokratik Toplumu ve Zulüm Üzerinden Temellendirilen Postmodern Bir Ütopya”, FLSF, Autumn, Vol. 14.

Leypoldt, Günter (2008). “Richard Rorty’s Literary Criticism and the Poetics of World-making”, New Literary History, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0010

Lyotard, L.F. (1994). Postmodern Durum, trans. Ahmet Çigdem, Ankara: Vadi Publishing.

Mouffe, Chantal, (2008). Siyasetin Dönüşü, trans. Fahri Bakırcı, Ali Çolak, Ankara, Epos Publishing.

Neil, Gross (2008). Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher, Chiago: University of Chicago Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich (2002). Güç İstenci. trans. Sedat Umran, İstanbul: Birey Publishing.

Niebuhr, R. (2004). Human Nature of the Nature and Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation, Westminster John Knox Press.

Nielsen, Kai. (2006). “Richard Rorty”, A Companion to Pragmatism içinde, Ed. John R. Shook, Joseph Margolis, Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997079.ch13

Rorty, Richard (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rorty, Richard (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of the Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rorty, Richard (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rorty, Richard (1989a). “Trotsky and The Wild Orcihds”, Philosophy and Social Hope, New York: Penguin Books.

Rorty, Richard (1989b). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397

Rorty, Richard (1994a). “Ethics without Principles”, Philosophy and Social Hope, London: Penguin Books.

Rorty, Richard (1994b). Philosophy and Social Hope, London: Penguin Books.

Rorty, Richard (1994c). “İnsan Hakları, Akıl ve Duyarlılık”, Journal of Birikim, trans. Mithat Sancar, Vol. 67, p. 56-68.

Rorty, Richard (1995a). Olumsallık İroni ve Dayanışma, trans. M. Küçük, A. Türker, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Publishing,

Rorty, Richard (1995b). “Philosophy & Future”, Rorty&Pragmatism, The Philosopher Responds to His Critics, London.

Rorty, Richard (2000). Postmodernist Burjuva Liberalizmi, trans. Yavuz Alogan, İstanbul: Mavi Ada Publishing.

Rorty, Richard (2006). Felsefe ve Doğanın Aynası, trans. Funda Günsoy Kaya, İstanbul: Paradigma Publishing

Rorty, Richard (2008). “Demokrasi ve Felsefe”, Cogito (Turkey), trans. Şeyda Öztürk, Sayı 54, p. 260-270.

Searle, John (2005). Toplumsal Gerçekliğin İnşası, trans. M. Macit, F. Özpilavcı, İstanbul: Litera Publishing

Searle, John, R. (2006) Zihin Dil Toplum, trans. Alaattin Tural, İstanbul: Litera Publishing

Tütüncü, Koray & Tütüncü, Fatma (2015). “Siyasi Tahayyüller, Ahlaki Normlar ve Edebi Anlatılar: Richard Rorty ve Martha Nussbaum’ın Katkıları”, FLSF, V. 20, p. 161-179.

Uluçakar Mustafa (2014). “Richard Rorty Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Journal of H.Ü. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 1, p. 229-247.

Wittgenstein, L., (1998) Felsefi Soruşturmalar, trans. Deniz Kanıt, İstanbul: Küyerel Publishing.

Wittgenstein, L., (2004) Felsefi Soruşturmalar, trans. Haluk Barışçan, İstanbul: Metis Publishing.

Wittgenstein, L., (2005). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Oruç Aruoba, İstanbul: Metis Publishing.

The Journal of Gazete Duvar. (2017, February 13) http://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/gundem/2017/02/13/marxsiz-ibn-i-rusdsuz-felsefe/.

The Journal of T24. (2017, January 17) http://t24.com.tr/haber/mebin-mufredat-taslaginda-cihat-degerler-basligi-altinda-ateizm-ve-sekulerizm-ise-inanc-problemi,383546.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-16

How to Cite

Selim, F. (2017). POSTMODERN LIBERALISM AND SOLIDARITY: RICHARD RORTY. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 654–671. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.32.654671