LIGNOCELLULOSES, SACCHARIDES AND BIO-ETHANOL YIELDS IN FUNGAL DI-CULTURE TREATED RICE HUSK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/mijst.2016.21.2131Keywords:
Fungi, Rice Husk, Di-Culture, Saccharine, Lignocelluloses, Bio-EthanolAbstract
Pure monoculture strains of Aspergillus fumigates (AF), Aspergillus niger (AN), Aspergillus oryzae (AO), Trichophyton mentagrophyte (TM), Trichophyton rubrum (TR) and Trichophyton Sudanese (TS) were isolated from decomposing rice husk and di-culture combination in equal proportion used for treatment of fresh heat treated rice husk. Freshly processed rice husk in Mantle’s medium, were heat pre-treated using an autoclave at 121oC for 20 minutes. The isolated fungi di-culture combinations were inoculated into each of the pre-heated rice husk with the exception of two controls (heated rice husk C1 and untreated rice husk C2). Seven days rice husk fungal di-culture hydrolysis was followed by estimation of saccharine, lignocelluloses and bio-ethanol yields. Fungal did-culture treated rice husks were left to ferment for 7 days with introduction of both bakers’ and palm wine yeast. The result (in percent ± standard error of the mean) obtained in the work gave the highest carbohydrate (20.53 ± 1.39 %) from rice husks treated with TS + TR did-culture. Other highest values obtained were as follows: soluble reducing sugar percentage yield (2.54 ± 0.37 %) was obtained from AF + AN as well as AO + TR; soluble non reducing sugar (18.08 ± 1.10 %) was from TS + TR; total lignin percentage yield of 26.00 ± 2.06 % was from rice husk treated with AN+TR; cellulose yield of 66.00±0.96 and hemicelluloses yield of 32.50±1.78% were obtained from AN+TS and AO+TR fungal did-culture treated rice husks respectively. The introduction of yeasts from palm wine gave the highest bio-ethanol yield (14.18 ± 0.13 %) from TM + TR treated rice husk broth, while 6.56 ± 0.26 % of bio-ethanol was from AO + TS treated rice husk fermented with baker's yeast. The selective treatment of rice husk with the fungal did-cultures illustrated to give the highest yield in each of the components carried out in this study will be ideal for the optimal production of the parameters studied from rice husk.
References
Belewu, M. A. & Badalona, F.T. (2009). Nutrient enrichment of some waste agricultural residues after solid state fermentation using Rhizopus oligosporus. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 13, 695 - 699.
Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Reberts, P.A. & Smith, F. (1956) Phenol sulphuric acid method for total carbohydrate. Analytical Chemistry, 25, p 350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 021/ac6 011 1a017
Ezeonu, C.S., Otitoju, O., Onwurah, I.N.E., Ejikeme, C.M., Ugbogu, O.C. & Anike, E.N. (2014). Enhanced availability of Biofuel and Biomass components in Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus fumigatus treated Rice Husk. European Scientific Journal, 10(18), 97-117.
Goering, H.D. & Vansoest, P.J. (1975). Forage Fibre Analysis, Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington.
Hodrova, B., Kopecny, J. & Kas, J. (1998). Cellulolytic enzymes of rumen anaerobic fungi Orpinomyces joyonii and Caecomyces communis. Res. Microbiol., 149, 417-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(98)80324-0
Khan, M. Y. & Dahot, M. U. (2010) Effect of Various Agriculture Wastes and Pure Sugars on the Production of Single Cell Protein by Penicillium Expansum. World Applied Sciences Journal 8, 80-84.
Lawal, S. A. & Ugheoke, B. I. (2010). Investigation of Alpha-Cellulose content of Agro-waste Products as Alternatives for Paper Production. Australian Journal of Technology, 13(4), 258-260.
Malherbe, S. & Cloete, T. E. (2002). Lignocellulose biodegradation: Fundamentals and applications. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 1(2),105-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020858910646
Marzieh, M. N. & Marjan, M. N. (2010). Utilization of sugar beet pulp as a substrate for the fungal production of cellulase and bioethanol. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 4(23), 2556-2561.
Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of Dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Oakley, E. T. (1984). Determination of cellulose index of tobacco. Americal Chemical Society, 32, 1192-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00125a065
Patel, S.J., Onkarappa, R. & Shobha, K.S. (2007). Comparative Study of Ethanol Production frome Microbial Pretreated Agricultural Résiduels. Journal of Apple Science and Environnemental Management, 11(4), 137-141.
Rayners, A. D. M. & Buddy, L. (1988). Fungal communities in the decay of wood. Adv. Microb. Ecol., 10, 115-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5409-3_4
Ritter, H. & Fleck, L. C. (1924). Determination of cellulose in wood. Industial Engineering and Chemistry, 16, 147-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50170a017
Sandhu, H., Bajaj, K. L. & Arneja, J. S. (1998). Biochemical Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Srivastava, A. K., Agrawal, P. and Rahiman, A. (2014). Delignification of Rice Husk and Production of Bioethanol. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET), 3(3), 10187-10194.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.