ENERGY VALUE IN BIOMASS AND PLASTIC COMPONENTS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

Authors

  • Chaitanya Nidhi Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India
  • Bhoora Sharma Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India
  • Prabhat Kumar Singh Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/mijst.2017.32.8092

Keywords:

Biomass, Plastic Waste, Reuse, Proximate Analysis, Higher Heating Value (HHV)

Abstract

Burning potencies of constituents of municipal solid waste (MSW) indicate energy value stored in them. A significant portion of biodegradable as well as non-biodegradable waste is still80 not recycled and most of them are either burnt or dumped in the landfills. The scope of this work is to study the energy value of selected biomass (dry garden leaves) and two plastic materials, low density polyethylene (LDPE) and polystyrene (PS), collected from an educational campus in Varanasi, India. Cow dung which is still used as domestic fuel in dry cake form in many parts of the country, has also been included. Two pellet batches of biomass, one each of Ashoka (Saraca Asoca) tree leaves and Cow dung, two pellet batches of plastic, one each of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and polystyrene (PS); and twelve biomass-plastic blended pellets have been prepared and tested. Proximate analyses and higher heating values (HHVs) were measured and compared with the gross calorific values (GCVs) of various grades of Indian non-coking thermal coals. The results indicate that on blending of biomass materials with plastics in 1:1 ratio, the HHV of mix exceed GCV of grade A non-coking coal. A 2:1 ratio gives material with heating values higher than grade C coal. Other tested mix proportions also produced heating values exceeding D grade coal. Thus, it appears feasible to produce secondary fuel using components of MSW for domestic consumptions. This is a non-conventional and renewable source of energy. This may partly reduce the dependence on fossil fuel (like coal) and provide an alternate reuse pathway for such materials.

References

Annual report (2013–14). Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. Retrieved from http://www.mnre.gov.in/annualreport/2010_11_English/index.htm.

ASTM, D., (2009). Test Methods for Proximate Analysis of the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke by Instrumental Procedures. ASTM International.

ASTM, D., (2011a). Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke. ASTM International.

ASTM, D., (2011b). Test Method for Ash in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke from Coal. ASTM International.

ASTM, D., (2011c). Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke. ASTM International.

Beamish, B.B. (1994). Proximate analysis of New Zealand and Australian coals by thermogravimetry. NZ. J. Geol. Geophys., 37, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1994.9514629

Fuel. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://gradestack.com/CBSE-Class-8th-Complete/Combustion-and-Flame/Fuel/14787-2855-2632-study-wtw.

Garcia, R., Pizarro, C., Lavin, A.G., Bueno, J.L. (2013).Biomass proximate analysis using thermogravimetry. Bioresour. Technol., 139, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.197

Garcia, R., Pizarro, C., Lavin, A.G., Bueno, J.L. (2014). Spanish biofuels heating value estimation. Part I: Ultimate analysis data. Fuel, 117, 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.049https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.048

Gug, J., Cacciola, D., Sobkowicz, M.J. (2015). Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics. Waste Management, 35, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.031

Kumar, A., Kumar, N., Baredar, P., Shukla, A. (2015). A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.007

McKendry, P. (2002). Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour. Technol., 83, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00119-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00120-1

Ministry of Coal, Government of India. Coal Grades. (2014, September 24). Retrieved from http://coal.nic.in/content/coal-grades.

Parikh, J., Channiwala, S.A., Ghosal, G.K. (2005). A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel, 84, 487–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.010

Pinto, F., Andre, R.N., Carolino, C., Miranda, M., Abelha, P., Direito, D., Perdikaris, N.,Boukis, I. (2014). Gasification improvement of a poor quality solid recovered fuel (SRF). Effect of using natural minerals and biomass wastes blends. Fuel, 117, 1034–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.015

Rathore, N.K. (2015). Campus Garden Waste: Examining Its Resource Values. (Unpublished master’s thesis). IIT (BHU), Varanasi, India.

Rotter, V.S., Lehmann, A., Marzi, T., Mohle, E., Schingnitz, D., Hoffmann, G. (2011). New techniques for the characterization of refuse-derived fuels and solid recovered fuels. Waste Management & Research, 29(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10364210

Sharma, B. (2016). Refused derived fuel from municipal solid waste. (Unpublished master’s thesis). IIT (BHU), Varanasi, India.

Soppimath, V.M., Hudedmani, M.G. (2017). Energy Audit and Energy Management in the Sugar Industry. MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 10 – 26.

Subramanian, P. (2000). Plastics recycling and waste management in the US. Resour. Conserv.Recycl., 28, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00049-X

Thorin, E., Boer, E.D., Belous, O., Song, H. (2012, July 5-8) Waste to Energy- A Review. International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE, Suzhou, China.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-18

How to Cite

Nidhi, C., Sharma, B., & Singh, P. (2017). ENERGY VALUE IN BIOMASS AND PLASTIC COMPONENTS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE. MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.20319/mijst.2017.32.8092