COMMUNICATING RESEARCH FINDINGS IN BASIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/Mijst.2017.32.0115Keywords:
Communication, C ommunicating Research, C ommunicating Research Framework Basic Science and Technology, Research, Utilization of ResearchAbstract
Communicating research findings in science education and in particular, basic science and technology seem to witness some sorts of ‘statistical jargons’ and lots of complexities with respect to the terms, methods, and language of communicating the results. For decades, lots of research work in Nigeria and outside Nigeria have been directed towards improving the standard and statuesque of science education for the scientific and technological advancement of the nation. The expected impacts of these robust findings on users and the overall outcomes on the technological development of the nation are not encouraging. The reasons could be attributed to the difficulty in interpreting the research results and the form the results are communicated to the users. Research results perhaps and sincerely should have been weapons for greater achievements in our science classrooms for scientific and technological developments of the nation at large. Study of this nature ensures that research findings have an impact on practice and practitioners including researchers, science teachers, professional trainees and non-professional readers for expected outputs. This paper therefore addressed communicating research findings in basic science and technology implications for professional trainees and non-professional readers and technological development. Finally, recommendations are made.
References
Beilenson, J. (2004). Developing effective poster presentations. Gerontology News, 32(9), 6-9
Brissoe, M. H. (1999). Preparing scientific illustrations: a guide to better posters, presentation and publication, 2nd edition: new York: Springer Veslag
British Council (2013). Communication Skills for Researchers. Retrieved 23 May, 2017, from www.britishcouncil.org
Brownell , S. E., Prince, J. V & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public
Federal Ministry of Education, Research Statistics and Planning Section. (2013)
Federal Ministry of Education (FME) (2013). National Policy on Education. Yaba, Lagos: NERDC Press.
Graham, K. & Logan, J. (2004). Using the Ottawa Model of Research use to implement a skin care program. Journal of Nursing care quality, 19:18-24.
Greenwood, M.R.L, Riordan, D.G. (2001). Civic Scientific/ civic duty. Science communication, 23, 28-40
Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford Advanced learner’s Dictionary of current English. 8th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Leshner al. (2003). Public Enagement with Science. Science, 299, 977
Miller, J. E. (2006). Preparing and presenting effective research posters. Health Research and Educational Trust. Pg315. Dol:10.111/j.1475-6773.2006.00588.x
National Science Education Standards (1996). Science Content Standards. Retrieved 2 May, 2017, from https://www.nap.edu/read/4962/chapter/8#105
Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council (2012)
Nguyen, D. (2014). Research Uptake: The Value of Effectively Communicating Research to your Audience. European Scientific Journal May 2014 /Special/ Edition Issn: 1857 – 7881 (Print) E - Issn 1857- 7431 578
Okpala, P. (2010). NECO GCE Results Released: 98% of Candidates Fail as NECO Releases Nov/Dec. http://www.information.ng.com/2010/03/neco-gce-results
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovation. Fifth Edition. Free Press, New York.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Published Articles
Author(s) retain the article copyright and publishing rights without any restrictions.
All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.