SHORT TERM HEALTH IMPACT ASSSESSMENT OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN A MADRID OFFICE

Authors

  • Roberto San José Software and Modelling Group, Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
  • Juan L. Pérez Software and Modelling Group, Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
  • Libia Pérez Software and Modelling Group, Computer Science School, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain
  • Rosa Maria Gonzalez Barras Department of Physics and Meteorology, Faculty of Physics, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.43.86101

Keywords:

Indoor Pollution, Health Impact, WRF/Chem, Energy Plus

Abstract

The present study is a short term health impact assessment of indoor pollution. To know the indoor pollution is necessary to get information about outdoor pollution and meteorological conditions. In this work, the outdoor data coming from a mesoscale meteorological and air quality simulation with WRF/Chem. Effects on health of different ventilation modes and indoor emission scenarios have been analyzed for the NO2 and PM2.5 pollutants. A general office building located in Madrid has been simulated with the EnergyPlus model during full year 2016.  The energy model includes the Generic Contaminant Model so the simulation system is an integrated framework for indoor pollution and energy demand. Results show that when the emitting sources are active, ventilation through windows improves health and if there are no active sources, the health of the building occupants is slightly deteriorated by the outdoor pollution. Ventilation during all year increases the demand of gas for heating four times. The health impacts of emitting sources are highest in the warm months due to the operation of the air conditioning system. The health impact of indoor emission sources is higher than the outdoor pollution. People in the zone where the emitting sources are located would experience a mortality and morbidity of 2.5 times more than in the non-emitting zones. 

References

Atkinson, R., Carey, I., Kent, A., van Staa, T., Anderson, H., & Cook, D. (2013). Long-Term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases. Epidemiology, 24(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318276ccb8

Bieser, J., Aulinger, A., Matthias, V., Quante, M., & Denier van der Gon, H. (2011). Vertical emission profiles for Europe based on plume rise calculations. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2935-2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.030

Destaillats, H., Maddalena, R., Singer, B., Hodgson, A., & McKone, T. (2008). Indoor pollutants emitted by office equipment: A review of reported data and information needs. Atmospheric Environment, 42(7), 1371-1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.080

Chen, C., & Zhao, B. (2011). Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmospheric Environment, 45(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.048

Das, P., Chalabi, Z., Jones, B., Milner, J., Shrubsole, C., & Davies, M. et al. (2013). Multi-objective methods for determining optimal ventilation rates in dwellings. Building And Environment, 66, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.021

EnergyPlus. (2018). Retrieved from https://energyplus.net/

Fabian, P., Adamkiewicz, G., & Levy, J. (2011). Simulating indoor concentrations of NO2 and PM2.5 in multifamily housing for use in health-based intervention modeling. Indoor Air, 22(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00742.x

Forkel, R., Werhahn, J., Hansen, A., McKeen, S., Peckham, S., Grell, G., & Suppan, P. (2012). Effect of aerosol-radiation feedback on regional air quality – A case study with WRF/Chem. Atmospheric Environment, 53, 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.009

Grell, G., & Dévényi, D. (2002). A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(14), 38-1-38-4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311

Guenther, A., Zimmerman, P., & Wildermuth, M. (1994). Natural volatile organic compound emission rate estimates for U.S. woodland landscapes. Atmospheric Environment, 28(6), 1197-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90297-6

Kuenen, J., Visschedijk, A., Jozwicka, M., & Denier van der Gon, H. (2014). TNO-MACC_II emission inventory: a multi-year (2003–2009) consistent high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling. Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics Discussions, 14(5), 5837-5869. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-5837-2014

Long, C., Suh, H., & tros Kout, P. (2001). Using Time- and Size-Resolved Particulate Data To Quantify Indoor Penetration and Deposition Behavior. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(22), 4584-4584. https://doi.org/10.1021/es011283d

McCubbin, D., Hallberg, A., & Davison, K. (2004). Assessment of Urban Air Pollution Impacts Using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BENMAP). Epidemiology, 15(4), S209. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200407000-00555

Milner, J., Vardoulakis, S., Chalabi, Z., & Wilkinson, P. (2011). Modelling inhalation exposure to combustion-related air pollutants in residential buildings: Application to health impact assessment. Environment International, 37(1), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.08.015

Persily, A., Musser, A., & Emmerich, S. (2010). Modeled infiltration rate distributions for U.S. housing. Indoor Air, 20(6), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00669.x

Sacks, J., Lloyd, J., Zhu, Y., Anderton, J., Jang, C., Hubbell, B., & Fann, N. (2018). The Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program – Community Edition (BenMAP–CE): A tool to estimate the health and economic benefits of reducing air pollution. Environmental Modelling & Software, 104, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.009

San José, R., Pérez, J., Morant, J., & González, R. (2008). European operational air quality forecasting system by using MM5–CMAQ–EMIMO tool. Simulation Modelling Practice And Theory, 16(10), 1534-1540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.021

San José, R., Pérez, J., Balzarini, A., Baró, R., Curci, G., & Forkel, R. et al. (2015). Sensitivity of feedback effects in CBMZ/MOSAIC chemical mechanism. Atmospheric Environment, 115, 646-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.030

Shrubsole, C., Ridley, I., Biddulph, P., Milner, J., Vardoulakis, S., & Ucci, M. et al. (2012). Indoor PM2.5 exposure in London's domestic stock: Modelling current and future exposures following energy efficient refurbishment. Atmospheric Environment, 62, 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.047

Taylor, J., Shrubsole, C., Biddulph, P., Jones, B., Das, P., & Davies, M. (2014). Simulation of pollution transport in buildings: the importance of taking into account dynamic thermal effects. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 35(6), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624414528722

Downloads

Published

2018-11-17

How to Cite

José, R. S., Pérez, J. L., Pérez, L., & Barras, R. M. G. (2018). SHORT TERM HEALTH IMPACT ASSSESSMENT OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY IN A MADRID OFFICE. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences, 4(3), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.43.86101