COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL METHOD, RADIOMETRIC METHOD AND METHOD USING OXIDATION-REDUCTION DYE FOR DETECTION OF MULTI DRUG RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS

Authors

  • Shashikant Vaidya Department of Clinical Pathology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Mumbai, India
  • Jaishankar Sharma Department of Clinical Pathology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Mumbai, India
  • Shreyasi Muley Haffkine Bio-pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd. Mumbai, India
  • Geeta Koppikar Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, India
  • Mohan Kulkarni T.N. Medical College and B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India
  • Abhay Chowdhary Grant Medical College and Sir J.J. Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/lijshls.2015.s11.7289

Keywords:

Drug Susceptibility Testing, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis, MABA

Abstract

Today Tuberculosis (TB) has become the most important communicable disease in the world. The emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) TB has become the main threat to TB treatment and control programs. Rapid detection of TB is critical for the effective treatment of patients. Recently, a method using the Oxidation - Reduction dye has been proposed for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tuberculosis). In the present study, we have compared Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) by conventional method, Radiometricmethod like BACTEC460TB (B460TB) System and Oxidation-Reduction Assay such as Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) for detection of MDR TB. Total 60 clinical isolates of M.tuberculosis were included in the study. The results obtained by MABA for DST of M.tuberculosis were compared with those obtained by B460TB system and Conventional method. DST results obtained by MABA showed good agreement with results obtained by B460TBsystem and Conventional method for Isoniazid and Rifampicin. In our study specificity and sensitivity for susceptible and resistant strain was found to be 98% and 100% for Rifampicin respectively and 100% and 95% for Isoniazid respectively for MABA.MABA appears to be a reliable method for the rapid and simultaneous detection of MDR-TB and DST of M. tuberculosis. It is simple and inexpensive method for DST of M.Tuberculosis with minimal biohazard risk. 

References

Cannetti, G. S., Froman, J., Grosset, P., Hauduroy, M., Langerora, H.T., Mahler, G., Meissner, Mitchison, D.A. and Sula, L. (1963). Mycobacteria: Laboratory methods for testing drug sensitivity and resistance. Bull W.H.O., 29, 565-578.

Collins, L., & Franzblau, S. G. (1997). Microplate alamar blue assay versus BACTEC 460 system for high-throughput screening of compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 41(5), 1004-1009.

Cornwall, J. (1997). Tuberculosis: a clinical problem of international importance. The Lancet, 350(9078), 660-661.

Franzblau, S. G., Witzig, R.S., McLaughlin, J.C., Madico, T.P., Hernandez, G., Michelle, A., Degnan, T., Cook, M.B., Quenzer, V.K., Fergusan, R.M. and Gilman, R.H. . (1998). Rapid low–technology MIC determination with clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using microplate alamar blue assay. J Clin Microbiol, 7, 362-366.

Gomez-Pastrana, D., Torronteras, R., Caro, P., Anguita, M. L., López-Barrio, A. M., Andres, A., & Navarro, J. (2001). Comparison of amplicor, in-house polymerase chain reaction, and conventional culture for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. Clinical infectious diseases, 32(1), 17-22.

Kumar, M., Khan, I., Verma, V., & Qazi, G. (2005). Microplate nitrate reductase assay versus Alamar Blue assay for MIC determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 9(8), 939-941.

Luquin, M., Gamboa, F., Barceló, M. G., Manterola, J., Matas, L., Giménez, M., & Ausina, V. (1996). Comparison of a biphasic non-radiometric system with Lowenstein-Jensen and Bactec-460 system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. Tubercle and Lung Disease, 77(5), 449-453.

Martin, A., Takiff, H., Vandamme, P., Swings, J., Palomino, J. C., & Portaels, F. (2006). A new rapid and simple colorimetric method to detect pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis using nicotinamide. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 58(2), 327-331.

Mohammadzadeh, A., Farnia, P., Ghazvini, K., Behdani, M., Rashed, T., & Ghanaat, J. (2006). Rapid and low-cost colorimetric method using 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride for detection of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 55(12), 1657-1659.

Montoro, E., Lemus, D., Echemendia, M., Martin, A., Portaels, F., & Palomino, J. C. (2005). Comparative evaluation of the nitrate reduction assay, the MTT test, and the resazurin microtitre assay for drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium

tuberculosis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 55(4), 500-505.

Morgan, M., Horstmeier, C., DeYoung, D., & Roberts, G. (1983). Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 18(2), 384-388.

Nunn, P., & Felten, M. (1994). Surveillance of resistance to antituberculosis drugs in developing countries. Tubercle and Lung Disease, 75(3), 163-167.

Palomino, J., & Portaels, F. (1999). Simple procedure for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a commercial colorimetic assay. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 18(5), 380-383.

Poojary, A., Nataraj, G., Kanade, S., Mehta, P., & Baveja, S. (2006). Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Its utility in resource poor settings. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 24(4), 268.

Roberts, G., Goodman, N., Heifets, L., Larsh, H., Lindner, T., McClatchy, J., . . . Wright, P. (1983). Evaluation of the BACTEC radiometric method for recovery of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from acid-fast smear-positive specimens. Journal of clinical microbiology, 18(3), 689-696.

Scarparo, C., Ricordi, P., Ruggiero, G., & Piccoli, P. (2004). Evaluation of the fully automated BACTEC MGIT 960 system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide, streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol and comparison with the radiometric BACTEC 460TB method. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42(3), 1109-1114.

Siddiqui, S. H., Libonati, J.P. and Middlebrook, G. (1981). Evaluation of a rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol, 13, 908-912.

Singh, S. (2004). HIV-TB Co-infection: A deadly combination, international symposium on Tuberculosis research.

Vestal, A. L. (1975). Procedures for the isolation and identification of Mycobacteria. Atlanta center for disease control.

WHO. (2014). Global Tuberculosis Report 2014: World Health Organization.

Yajko, D. M., Madej, J. J., Lancaster, M. V., Sanders, C. A., Cawthon, V. L., Gee, B., . . . Hadley, W. K. (1995). Colorimetric method for determining MICs of antimicrobial agents for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(9), 2324-2327.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

Vaidya, S., Sharma, J., Muley, S., Koppikar, G., Kulkarni, M., & Chowdhary, A. (2015). COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL METHOD, RADIOMETRIC METHOD AND METHOD USING OXIDATION-REDUCTION DYE FOR DETECTION OF MULTI DRUG RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences, 1(01), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.20319/lijshls.2015.s11.7289

Most read articles by the same author(s)