DEBT, PAYBACK, AND THE SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH THE VEGETAL IMAGINATION: ATWOOD’S PAYBACK AND HAN KANG’S THE VEGETARIAN

Authors

  • Jihyun Lee Department of English Literature, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.5778

Keywords:

The Vegetarian, Payback, Debt, Fantasy, The Real, The Vegetal Imagination

Abstract

This paper is a close reading of Han Kang’s ‘The Vegetarian’ centrally in relation to the author’s notion of ‘innocence’ and to Margaret Atwood’s notion of ‘debt’ and ‘payback’. Building upon this foundation, Gaston Bachelard’s concept of the ‘vegetal imagination’ will then be incorporated into the paper’s broader psychoanalytic context as a means of explaining the protagonist, Yeong- hye’s relationship to moral debt. What is important to understand for this paper is that the vegetal imagination embraces contradiction. In this respect, the vegetal imagination can be seen as sympathetic towards both human beings and nature, aiming for sustainability. Actually, Han portrays Yeong-hye as the epitome of someone trying to embrace the victims of a violent history, symbolized in the novel as uprooted trees.

References

Atwood, M. (2008). Payback: Debt and the shadow side of wealth. Toronto, ON: House of Anasi.

Bachelard, G. (1964). The psychoanalysis of fire. (C. M. Alan, Trans.). London, LDN: Routledge. (Original work published 1938)

Bachelard, G. (1988). Air and dreams: An essay on the imagination of movement. (E. R. & C. F. Farrell, Trans.). Dallas, TX: The Dallas Institute Publications. (Original work published 1943)

Bachelard, G. (1991). Earth and reveries of repose. (M. M. Jones, Trans.). Dallas, TX: The Dallas Institute Publications. (Original work published 1948)

Blake, W. (1982). The complete poetry and prose of William Blake. D. V. Erdman (Ed.). Berkeley, CA: U of California Press.

Clemens, C. L. (2016). The Vegetarian. World Literature Today, 90 (3), 91-92. https://doi.org/10.7588/worllitetoda.90.3-4.0091a

Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.

Dickens, C. (1999). Great Expectations. New York, NY: Norton. (Original work published 1860)

Eliot, G. (1994). The mill on the floss. C.T. Christ (Ed.). New York, NY: Norton. (Original work published 1994). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781784600747.00000004

Fink, B. (1997). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

Gause. A. (n.d.). Can the Federal Reserve System continue indefinitely? [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://www.andygause.com/articles/question-and-answer-with-andrewgause/can-the- federal-reserve-system-continue-indefinitely/

Gilman, C. P. (2004). Social ethics: Sociology and the future of society. M. R. Hill & M. J. Deegan (Ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. (Original work published 1914)

Han, K. (2015). The vegetarian. (D. Smith. Trans.). London, LDN: Portobello Books. (Original work published 2007)

Han, K. (2016a). Convalescence. (S. H. Jeon. Trans.). Paju, GG: Asia Publishers. (Original work published 2007)

Han, K. (2016b, May 30). Han Kang at Seoul Book and Culture Club. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkkLmQJHNlc

Jackson, R. (1998). Fantasy: The literature of subversion. London, LDN: Routledge. (Original work published 1981).

Kang, J. (2012). The Construction of the Subject through Reading Literary Texts: A Psychoanalytic Approach. Studies in British and American Language and Literature 102, 247-67.

Kim, H. J. (2015). Traversing the social fantasy of detective stories in Mark Twain‘s ‗The Stolen White Elephant‘. The Journal of Criticism and Theory, 20, 235-56.

Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. (S. Leon. Trans.) Roudiez. New York, NY: Columbia UP.

Lacan, J. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan book XI. (A. Sheridan. Trans.). New York, NY: Norton & Company. (Original work published 1973)

Lee, J. H. (2015). Literary imagination in Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: Between fantasy and the real. Studies in British and American Language and Literature, 119, 183-206.

Luce I. & Marder. M. (2016). Through vegetal being: Two philosophical perspectives. New York, NY: Columbia UP.

Shipman, A. (2015). Capitalism without capital: Accounting for the crash. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442444

Skidelsky, W. (2008, November 2). Debt shall have its dominion [Review of the book Payback by M. Atwood]. theguardian. Retrieved from

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/nov/02/payback-margaret-atwood

Suess, B. A. (2003). The Writing s on the Wall: Symbolic Orders in The Yellow Wallpaper. Women's Studies, 32(1), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870310086

Žižek, S. (1991). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-20

How to Cite

Lee, J. (2017). DEBT, PAYBACK, AND THE SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH THE VEGETAL IMAGINATION: ATWOOD’S PAYBACK AND HAN KANG’S THE VEGETARIAN. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.5778