DJ MODEL: A MODEL OF SERVICE RECOVERY FOR STUDENT SATISFACTION USING DISTRIBUTIVE, INTERACTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL APPROACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.967982Keywords:
Distributive Justice, Interactional Justice, Procedural Justice, WOM, Trust, and LoyaltyAbstract
A failure in service will result in customer dissatisfaction. Unfortunately, not all unsatisfied consumers are willing to convey their complaints to the service provider concerned, but they switch to another service instead. This study is conducted at private universities in East Java, Indonesia which include Universitas, Institut, and Sekolah Tinggi with the category of Excellent, Favorite and Non-Favorite. To support the completeness of the data, this study involves 75-80 students per university. Purpuse of research: 1) the relationship and the effect of justice perceptions, with the dimensions of distributive justice (DJ), interactional justice (IJ) and procedural justice (PJ), on satisfaction, 2) the relationship and the effect of satisfaction on trust, word of mouth and loyalty, and 3) the relationship and the effect of the dimensions of distributive justice, interactional justice and procedural justice on trust, WOM and loyalty directly and indirectly mediated by satisfaction. The results show universities category of excellent, DJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Universitas and Institut, but DJ has no effect on student satisfaction at Sekolah Tinggi. PJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Universitas and Sekolah Tinggi, but PJ has no effect on student satisfaction at Institut. IJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Sekolah Tinggi, but IJ has no effect on student satisfaction at universitas and institut. Universities with category of favorite, DJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Universitas, Institut and Sekolah Tinggi. However, PJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Institut only, while at Universitas and Sekolah Tinggi, PJ has no effect on student satisfaction. Universities with category of non-favorite, DJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Universitas, Institut, and Sekolah Tinggi. However, PJ has positive effect on student satisfaction at Universitas only, while at Institut and Sekolah Tinggi, PJ has no effect on student satisfaction.
References
Ah-Keng Kau dan Elizabeth Wan-Yiun Loh (2006) The Effect of service recovery on consumer Satisfaction a comparison between compainants and non-complainants Journal of Service Marketing 20/2 (2006) 101-111
East R. (2000). Complaining as Planned Behavior Psychology & Marekting.Vol 17 (12):1077- 1095.
Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S. (2006) Business research methods (ed.): McGraw-Hill.
Dick, A.S. and Kunal Basu (1994) Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework Journal of the Academic of Marketing Science Vol. 22 (2): 99-113.
http://www.indonesiainfrastructurenews.com/2014/02/pelayanan-kementerian-pendidikan-Dan-kesehatan-dinilai-buruk/http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2011/11/14/kenapa-kuliah-membosankan-410138.html http://suarakomunitas.net/baca/8725/keluhan-mahasiswa-
unila-terhadap-birokrasi-kampus/Gustaffson, Anders (2009) Customer Satisfaction with Service Recovery.Journal of Business Research Vol.62: 1220-1222.
Gronroos, C. (1988). Service quality: the six criteria of good perceived service. Review of Business, Vol. 9, Winter pp. 10-30.
Kana, Any Agus (2001) Mass Customization Sebuah Alternatif untuk meningkatkan kepuasan Pelanggan, Yogyakarta .Jurnal kompak, STIE YO,
Kelley, Douglas Hoffman, and Mark A. Davis (1993) “A Typology of Retail Failures and Recoveries” Journal of Retailing 69 (winter): 429-452
Lovelock, C. (2001) Service Marketing: People, Technology and Strategy. 4th ed. UpperSaddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Mattilla, Anna S. (2001). The Effectiveness of Service Recovery in the Multi-Industry Setting Journal of Service Marketing Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 583-596.
McDougall, G.H., & Levesque, T. (2000) Customer satisfaction with service: Putting Perceived value into the equation Journal of Services Marketing 14 (5), 392–410
Parasuraman A, Zeithhaml V.A, Berry L.L. (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and it Implication for future research Journal of Marketing Vol 49: 41-50.
Richard L. Oliver. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 17, No. 4 .pp. 460-469
Seider, Kathleen and Berry, Leonard L. (1998) Service Fainess: What it is and why it matters. Academy of Management Executive Vol. 12 No. 2
Singh, J. and Shefali Pandya (1991) Exploring the Effect of Customer Dissatisfaction Levelon
Complain Behaviors. European Journal of Marketing Vol. 25 (9): 7-21
Soni Harsono. (2011). Students’ Perception on Attraction and Service Satisfaction in STIE Perbanas Surabaya, Proceeding SEAAIR Conference, Chiangmai Thailand.
Soni Harsono. (2012). the Effect of College Image towards Recommendation Preference (A Case Study at STIE Perbanas Surabaya) IAMURE International Journal of Business and Management Vol 4 October 2012. pp 20-37.
Tax, Stephen S., Brown, Stephen W., and Chandrasekaran (1998) Customer Evaluation of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 (April)
Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1993) the nature and determinants of Customer expectations of services Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 21, winter, pp. 31-46
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.