A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGIOUS CONSUMERIST LANDSCAPE RESOURCES AND RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

Authors

  • Ching- Cheng Shen The Graduate Institute of Travel and Tourism Management, National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism, Taiwan
  • Shang-Yu Liu The Graduate Institute of Travel and Tourism Management, National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.238253

Keywords:

Religious Tourism, Consumerist Landscape Resources, Experience, Nankunshen Temple

Abstract

Faith in a Gods or divinities has always been the focus and sustenance of the development of civilizations, and is closely related to people’s lives. Coupled with the arts and humanities, astronomy, geography and customs, and living customs has played a part in shaping unique landscape resources and the possession of rich and deep cultural assets. With their involvement in religious activities, people have acquired sustenance and a sense of belonging from their religious beliefs and this has subsequently brought pleasure from tourism. There are over 12,000 registered temples in Taiwan, forming a special phenomenon in Taiwanese folk religion. Therefore, an important topic for discussion regarding to the development of religious tourism will be: how to shape landscape resources for religious consumerists in order to offer the consumerists profound experience, as well as creating an in-depth understanding of Taiwanese religious cultures and generating a reliance on recognition and emotions of consumerists. Themed on researches which were previously undertaken on the relationship between religious consumerist landscape resources and religious experience, this study adopts the Nankunshen Temple as the research object for empirical study. The research results of this study consist of: (1) through factor analysis, this study extracted the factor dimensions of religious consumerist landscape resources. In order, these dimensions are “the holiness and solemnity of the religion”,“the beauty of the magnificent art”, “atmosphere of the religious culture”, “the center of spiritual sustenance”” and “the reliance of living philosophy”. The factor dimensions of experience are “sensory experience”, “thought experience”, “emotional experience”, “action experience”, and “relational experience”. (2) In terms of the dimensions of the landscape resources of religious tourism, “the holiness and solemnity of the religion” was placed first, followed by “the beauty of magnificent art”; (3) In terms of the experience dimensions, the first place went to “sensory experience”, followed by “thought experience”. (4) After regression analysis, it is found that religious consumerist landscape resources were the most important factor for experience. In terms of sensory experience, the beauty of magnificent buildings occupied first place, followed by spiritual sustenance. In terms of emotional experience, the first place went to the center of spiritual sustenance, followed by the reliance of life philosophy. Regarding thought experiences, religious cultural atmosphere was in first place, followed by the center of spiritual sustenance. For the action experience, the first place was given to the center of spiritual sustenance, followed by religious cultural atmosphere. For relational experience, the reliance of life philosophy was in first place, followed by religious cultural atmosphere. The research results of this study can offer a reference for relevant organizations involved in the development of religious tourism.

References

Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior (2012): the report on the interior statistics in the year of 2012—overview of religious temples, churches. The date of online search: Oct 6th, 2013. Website: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=6514

Dugandžija, N. (1986). Društvenipoložajinacionalnareligioznost u Hrvatskoj. Revijazasociologiju, 16(1-4), 91-106.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feel and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140.

Kelly, J. (1987). Freedom to be-a new sociology of leisure. New York: Macmillan.

Martin, G. J., & James, P. E. (1993).All possible worlds: A history of geographical ideas (3th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, INC.

Meining, D. W. (1979). The interpretation of ordinary landscape: Geographical essays. New York: Oxford University Press.

Monkhouse, F. J. (1970). A dictionary of geography (2nd ed.). London: Edward Amold.

Nagasawa, S. (2009).Customer experience management influencing on human Kansei to management of technology.The TQM Journal, 20(4), 312-323.

Neilson, W. A. (1959). Webster’s new international dictionary of the English language. G & C Merrian Co.

Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential marketing.Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1), 53-67.

Stamp, L. D. (1961).A history of land use in Arid Regions.United Nation Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Santayana, G. (1955).The sense of beauty. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Vukonic, B. (1992). Medjugorje religious and tourism connection.Annal of Tourism Research, 19(1), 79-91.

Ward, L. M., & Russell, J. A. (1981).Cognitive set and the perception of place.Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 610-632.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-01

How to Cite

Shen, C., & Yu Liu, S. (2015). A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGIOUS CONSUMERIST LANDSCAPE RESOURCES AND RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2015.s21.238253