FROM REJECTION TO CONFRONTATION: A STUDY ON THE ONTOLOGICAL SECURITY PERSPECTIVE OF POLAND’S RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA

Received: 17th April 2024 Revised: 31st May 2024 & 4th April 2024 Accepted: 20th April 2024

Authors

  • KE Yan School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2024.102.6075

Keywords:

Poland-Russia Relations, Ontological Security, Polish Diplomacy, National Super-Ego

Abstract

In the field of international security studies, attention to ontological security issues has become a focal point. Ontological security at the national level manifests as the dynamic harmony between“national super-ego” and “national Id”, representing a common product in the subject relations. Ontological security crisis is the result of the failure of “national ego” regulation. Positioned in the geopolitical periphery, Poland, over millennia, has developed a distinct“national super-ego” and a strong sense of identity. However, throughout its history, Poland has repeatedly faced ontological security challenges from Russia. For Poland, Russia has transformed from being the “other” to the “excluded”, ultimately becoming the “adversary” in Poland's ontological security. Since the “post-Cold War” era, Poland has endeavored to reshape its ontological security through internal and external measures. Ontological security provides a novel perspective for international relations research.

References

Alexander Wendt(1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Anthony Giddens(1991). Modernity and Self-Identity:Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brent J. Steele(2014). Ontological Security in International Relations Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.

Ejdus Filip(2017) .Not a Heap of Stones: Material Environments and Ontological Security in International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1271310

Jennifer Mitzen(2006). Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346

Nina C.Krickel-Choi(2024).State Personhood and Ontological Security as a Framework of Existence: Moving beyond Identity, Discovering Sovereignty. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 37(1), 3-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2022.2108761

R. D. Laing(2010). The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. the United States of America: Penguin Books.

http://www.centrebombe.org/Ronald.D.Laing-The.Divided.Self.(1960).pdf

Samuel Phillips Huntington(1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. NewYork:Simon&Schuster. https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/1993SamuelPHuntingtonTheClashOfCivilizationsAndTheRemakingofWorldOrder.pdf

Sigmund Freud(2018). The Ego and the Id.New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company. https://www.sigmundfreud.net/the-ego-and-the-id-pdf-ebook.jsp#google_vignette

Stephan Klose(2020).Interactionist role theory meets ontological security studies: an exploration of synergies between socio-psychological approaches to the study of international relations. European Journal of International Relations,26(3), 851-874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119889401

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

KE Yan. (2024). FROM REJECTION TO CONFRONTATION: A STUDY ON THE ONTOLOGICAL SECURITY PERSPECTIVE OF POLAND’S RELATIONS WITH RUSSIA: Received: 17th April 2024 Revised: 31st May 2024 & 4th April 2024 Accepted: 20th April 2024. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2024.102.6075