RESPONSE OF SOME FORAGE PEA GENOTYPES TO SALT STRESS DURING THE SEEDLING STAGE

Authors

  • Onur ILERI Eskisehir OsmangaziUniversity, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • Abdulsamed CANBAY Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • Mahmut BARAN Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
  • Ali KOC Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2017.32.2437

Keywords:

Forage Pea, Germination, Salinity, Seedling Vigor

Abstract

Salinity stress is a common problem under dry climatic condition all over the world. The determination of salt tolerant genotypes has a crucial importance to alleviate this problem. Pea known as the most salt tolerant plant among legumes and seedling stage is the most sensitive to salt stress than the other growth stages. The experiment was carried out in the growth chamber to observe tolerance of the examined genotypes to different salt doses. Therefore germination rates, mean germination time (mgt), root/shoot lengths and fresh/dry seedling weights of some forage pea genotypes (Local population, Crackerjack, Golyazi, Ozkaynak, Rose, Taskent, Tore, Ulubatlı) under different salt concentrations (Control, 5, 10, 15 and 20 dS m-1) were determined. The results showed that salinity x genotype interaction was significant among genotypes with respect to all investigated parameters. Crackerjack had the highest germination rate and root length with the increasing salt levels and it was followed by Ozkaynak, Rose, Taskent and Tore. Ozkaynak was the fastest germinated genotype with respect to mgt with 1,92 days and the genotype had the longest shoot length. Fresh seedling weight of Crackerjack was the higher than all other genotypes but there was not a significant difference between Rose and Crackerjack. Results indicated that Taskent, Tore, Ozkaynak, cultivars could be recommended upto moderate saline areas while Crackerjack and Rose could be recommended for slightly saline areas

References

Abdul-Jaleel, C., Gopi, R., Sankar, B., Manivannan, P., Kishorekumar, A., Sridharan, R. & Panneerselvam, R. (2007). Studies on germination, seedling vigour, lipid peroxidation and proline metabolism in Catharanthus roseus seedlings under salt stres. South African Journal of Botany, 73, 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2006.11.001

Acikgoz, E. (2001). Yem Bitkileri. Bursa, Uludag Universitesi Guclendirme Vakfi, Yayin No: 182.

Almansouri, M., Kinet, J. M. & Lutts, S. (2001). Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant and Soil, 231, 243– 254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010378409663

Avcıoglu, R., Hatipoglu, R. & Karadag Y. (2009). Yem Bitkileri. Izmir, TC Tarım ve Koyisleri Bakanlıgı Tarımsal Uretim ve Gelistirme Genel Mudurlugu.

Barbouchi, M., Abdelfattah, R., Member, S., Chokmani, K., Aissa, N. B., Lhissou, R. & El- Harti, A. (2014). Soil salinity characterization using polarimetric In SAR coherence: case studies in Tunisia and Morocco, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 1–10.

Bonilla, I., El-Hamdaoui, A. & Bolaños Boron, L. (2004). Pisum sativum seed germination and seedling development under salt stres. Plant and Soil, 267, 97– 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-4689-7

Carpici, E. B., Celik, N. & Bayram, G. (2009). Effects of salt stress on germination of some maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(19), 4918 - 4922.

Cerda, A., Caro, M. & Fernandez, F. G. (1982). Salt tolerance of two pea cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 74, 796-798. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050007x

Dua, R., Sharma, S. & Mishra, B. (1989). Response of broad bean (Vicia faba) and pea (Pisum sativum) to salinity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 59, 729-731.

Ellis, R. H. & Roberts, E. H. (1980). Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. London. In: Hebblethwaite, P.D. (Ed.). Seed Production. Butterworths, pp. 605–635.

Gorji, T., Sertel, E. & Tanik, A. (2017). Monitoring soil salinity via remote sensing technology under datascarce conditions: A case study from Turkey. Ecological Indicators, 74, 384– 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.043

Jamil, M., Deog-Bae, L., Kwang-Yong, J., Ashraf, M., Sheong-Chun, L. & Eui-Shik, R. (2006). Effect of salt (NaCl) stress on germination and early seedling growth of four vegetables species. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7(2), 273-282.

Jayasundara, H. P. S., Thomson, B. D. & Tang, C. (1998). Response of cool season grain legumes to soil abiotic stresses. Advances in Agronomy, 63, 77-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60242-4

Metternicht, G. I. & Zinck, J. A. (2008). Remote sensing of soil salinization: impact onland management. In: Shrestha, D.P., Farshad, A. (Eds.), Mapping Salinity Hazard: An Integrated Application of Remote Sensing and Modeling-BasedTechniques, 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, pp. 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420065039

Moud, A. M. & Maghsoudi, K. (2008). Salt stress effects on respiration and growth of germinated seeds of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 351-358.

Najafi, F., Khavari-Nejad, R. A., Rastgar-Jazii, F. & Sticklen, M., (2007). Growth and some physiological attributes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) as affected by salinity. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10(16), 2752-2755. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.2752.2755

Noreen, Z., Ashraf, M. & Hassan M. U. (2007). Inter-accessional variation for salt tolerance in pea (Pisum sativum L.) at germination and seedling stage. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(6), 275-285.

Noreen, Z. & Ashraf, M. (2009). Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salttreated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166(16), 1764-1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.05.005

Okcu, G., Kaya, M. D. & Atak, M. (2005). Effects of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29, 237-242.

Olmos, E. & Hellín, E., (1996). Mechanisms of salt tolerance in a cell line of Pisum sativum: biochemical and physiological aspects. Plant Science, 120(1), 37- 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04483-4

Parida, A. K. & Das, A. B. (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 60(3), 324-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010

Rehman, S., Harris, P. J. C., Bourne, W. F. & Wilkin, J. (1996). The effect of sodium chloride on germination and the potassium and calcium content of Acacis seeds. Seed Science and Technology, 25, 45-57.

Steppuhn, H., Volkmar, K. M. & Miller, P. R. (2001). Comparing canola, field pea, dry bean, and durum wheat crops grown in saline media. Crop Science, 41(6), 1827- 1833. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.1827

Tan, M., Koç, A., Çomaklı, B. & Elkoca, E. (2011). Dogu Anadolu Bolgesi’nden toplanan yem bezelyesi populasyonlarının bazı özellikleri. Uluslararası Katılımlı I. Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı, 27-30 Nisan.

Uzun, A., Bilgili, U., Sincik, M., Filya, I. & Acikgoz, E., (2005). Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types. European journal of agronomy, 22(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.01.001

Wang, W. B., Kim, Y. H., Lee, H. S., Kim, K. Y., Deng, X. P. & Kwak, S. S. (2009). Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.009

Zhu, H. & Banuelos, G. (2016). Influence of salinity and boron on germination, seedling growth and transplanting mortality of guayule: A combined growth chamber and greenhouse study. Industrial Crops and Products, 92, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.07.027

Downloads

Published

2017-09-14

How to Cite

Ileri, O., Canbay, A., Baran, M., & Koc, A. (2017). RESPONSE OF SOME FORAGE PEA GENOTYPES TO SALT STRESS DURING THE SEEDLING STAGE. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences, 3(2), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2017.32.2437