A COMPULSIVE FORCE SCHEMA MODEL FOR INVESTIGATION INTO EVENT TYPES OF THE BA RESULTATIVES IN MANDARIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.283292Keywords:
Resultative, Force, Event, MandarinAbstract
This paper presents four event types of the BA resultatives which involve metaphorical extensions of FORCE relative to COMPULSION. This paper further proposes constructional analyses of event types of the BA resultatives in the framework of Construction Grammar.
References
Andersen, Roger W. (1990). Papiamentu tense-aspect, with special attention to dis-course. In J. V. Singler (ed.), Pidgin and creole tense-mood-aspect systems, 59-96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen and C.-T.James Huang. (1994). On the argument structure of resultative compounds. In Matthew Chen and Ovid Tzeng (eds.), A festschrift for William S.-Y. Wang, 187-221. Nottingham: Pyramid Press.
Cristofaro, Sonia. (2003). Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, Robert M W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds). (2000). Changingvalency: case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dowty, David.R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1991). A Semantic Account of Resultatives.Linguistic analysis, 21, 1-2.
Goldberg, Adele. (1995). Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1998). Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hollmann, Willem B. (2006). Passivisability of English periphrastic causatives. In Stefan Th. Gries and AnatolStefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: the syntax-lexis interface, 193-224. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, Mark. (1987). The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Shi, Ziqiang. (1988). The present of past of the particle le in Mandarin Chinese.
Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.
Smith, Carlota S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tai, James H-Y. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In D. Testen, V.Mishra and J.Drogo (eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics, 287-296. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Talmy, Leonard. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive science, 12 (1), 49-100.
Van Valin, Robert D. and Randy J. LaPolla.(1997). Syntax.structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. (1975). Why “kill” does not mean “cause to die”: The semantics of action sentences. Foundations of language, 13, 491–528.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
